NEWS & INSIGHTS

Trademark Similarity Case: NICOLE MILLER

Assess the marks objectively, as a whole and through separate observation of appearance, sound and meaning. The relevant question is whether their use for the designated goods may cause confusion about commercial origin.

2008 Hu 4783 Judgment [Trademark refusal]
[Legal]
A shared element does not establish similarity where consumers are unlikely to perceive it separately or where the marks' overall impressions clearly distinguish their sources.
Earlier registered Trademark 1
The Earlier registered Trademark 2
Applied for trademark
Mark
Illustration: Trademark Similarity Case: NICOLE MILLER
Illustration: Trademark Similarity Case: NICOLE MILLER
Illustration: Trademark Similarity Case: NICOLE MILLER
[Comparison]
NICOLE MILLER shares MILLER with one earlier mark and NICOLE with another. Korean consumers would nevertheless recognize the application as a Western personal name and naturally pronounce it as Nicole Miller as a whole.
[Decisions]
Because the application would not naturally be divided into NICOLE or MILLER alone, its appearance, pronunciation and concept distinguished it from the earlier marks. The marks were dissimilar.

Read the Korean source

This article reflects the information available when it was published. Contact us to discuss your circumstances.
Discuss this topic ↗All articlesRelated service: Designs & trade marks ↗ Related service: IP disputes & appeals ↗

Put your IP strategy into practice.