NEWS & INSIGHTS

Trademark Similarity: Labrador Retriever versus DAWN FIELD

The assessment considers appearance, sound and meaning in the context of the designated goods, focusing on the risk of confusion about their commercial origin.

2006 Hu 3557 Judgment [Trademark refusal]
[Legal]
Marks are assessed as a whole for source confusion. A shared element does not establish similarity if it is unlikely to be perceived independently or the overall impression clearly distinguishes the marks.

Cited mark
Applied for trademark
Illustration: Trademark Similarity: Labrador Retriever versus DAWN FIELDIllustration: Trademark Similarity: Labrador Retriever versus DAWN FIELD

[Judgment]
Illustration: Trademark Similarity: Labrador Retriever versus DAWN FIELDThe applied-for mark: Illustration: Trademark Similarity: Labrador Retriever versus DAWN FIELDand the earlier mark both depict a dog standing in profile with its tail raised. However, many dog graphics were registered for similar goods. The clearly different wording, Labrador Retriever and DAWN FIELD, and its placement distinguished the marks as a whole.
[Decisions]
The marks were therefore dissimilar.

Read the Korean source

This article reflects the information available when it was published. Contact us to discuss your circumstances.
Discuss this topic ↗All articlesRelated service: Designs & trade marks ↗ Related service: IP disputes & appeals ↗

Put your IP strategy into practice.