NEWS & INSIGHTS

Trademark Similarity: LUISE versus MS. LOUISE

The applied-for and earlier registered marks differ in appearance. The applied-for mark is a coined expression, so a meaningful conceptual comparison cannot be made.

2008 Heo 2619 Trademark refusal
Earlier registered markApplied for trademark
MarkIllustration: Trademark Similarity: LUISE versus MS. LOUISEIllustration: Trademark Similarity: LUISE versus MS. LOUISE
[Similarity of the marks]
1. Appearance and concept
The applied-for and earlier registered marks differ in appearance. The applied-for mark is a coined expression, so a meaningful conceptual comparison cannot be made.
2. Pronunciation
“LUISE” may be pronounced in Korean as “ruiseu” or “ruije”. In “MS. LOUISE”, the title “MS.” has weak distinctiveness and can be separated from “LOUISE”. The latter may be pronounced as “ruiseu”, “rui” or “ruije”, making the marks identical or similar in pronunciation.
[Designated goods]
The applied-for mark's skirts, cardigans and leather belts are identical to corresponding goods under the earlier mark.
[Decisions]
Although their appearances differ and their concepts are not comparable, the marks have identical or similar pronunciations. Use on identical or similar goods could therefore cause confusion as to source.
The court found the marks similar. Because some designated goods are also identical, registration was refused.

Read the Korean source

This article reflects the information available when it was published. Contact us to discuss your circumstances.
Discuss this topic ↗All articlesRelated service: Designs & trade marks ↗ Related service: IP disputes & appeals ↗

Put your IP strategy into practice.