NEWS & INSIGHTS

Trademark Similarity: AUTOMAGICALLY versus MAGIC AUTO

The applied-for mark consists of “AUTOMAGICALLY,” describing something that happens automatically with an apparently magical element and a better-than-expected result. The word combines the ideas expressed by “automatic” and “magical.”

2008 Heo 11088 Trademark refusal
Earlier registered markApplied for trademark
MarkIllustration: Trademark Similarity: AUTOMAGICALLY versus MAGIC AUTOIllustration: Trademark Similarity: AUTOMAGICALLY versus MAGIC AUTO
Designated GoodsPerfume, manicure, etc.Cosmetics

[Comparison of appearance, pronunciation and concept]
“AUTOMAGICALLY” blends “automatic” and “magical”, suggesting that something happens automatically with a seemingly magical effect. Korean consumers may be unfamiliar with the entire word but recognize “AUTO” and “MAGIC”. For cosmetics, the court considered that the mark suggests an effect occurring automatically, as if by magic.
“MAGIC AUTO” similarly suggests an automatic, magical effect for perfume and related goods.
The marks have very similar concepts. Despite their different appearances and pronunciations, use on identical or similar cosmetics could cause confusion as to source. The court found the marks similar.
[Designated goods]
The applied-for mark's cosmetics encompass the earlier mark's perfume and related goods, so the designated goods are identical.
[Decisions]
The marks are similar and their designated goods are identical.

Read the Korean source

This article reflects the information available when it was published. Contact us to discuss your circumstances.
Discuss this topic ↗All articlesRelated service: Designs & trade marks ↗ Related service: IP disputes & appeals ↗

Put your IP strategy into practice.