NEWS & INSIGHTS

Trademark Similarity Case: Ganji

The similarity assessment considers appearance, sound and meaning against the overall impression the marks make on ordinary consumers and traders.

2007 Heo 159 Trademark refusal
[Principles of assessment]
Service-mark similarity is assessed through overall appearance, pronunciation and concept, considering how ordinary consumers perceive the marks and whether their sources may be confused.

Earlier registered mark
Applied for trademark
Mark
GANZI
Ganzinala
Designated Goods
Hats, socks, jumpers, gymnastics outfits, two-piece outfits and parkas, among other goods.
Hats, socks, jumpers, gymnastics outfits, two-piece outfits and parkas, among other goods.
[Comparison]
1. Appearance
Both are word marks, but their letters and capitalization differ, giving them different appearances.
2. Pronunciation and concept.
“GANZI” may be pronounced “ganji” or “ganzi”. In “Ganzinala”, the Korean word “nara” means a country or a figurative place associated with the preceding word and may have weak distinctiveness. If the earlier mark is shortened to “Ganji”, the pronunciation and concept coincide or are similar, creating a likelihood of confusion on the designated clothing goods.
[Decisions]
Despite their different appearances, the marks have similar pronunciations and concepts that could cause confusion as to source. The court found them similar.

Read the Korean source

This article reflects the information available when it was published. Contact us to discuss your circumstances.
Discuss this topic ↗All articlesRelated service: Designs & trade marks ↗ Related service: IP disputes & appeals ↗

Put your IP strategy into practice.