NEWS & INSIGHTS

Trademark Similarity: A Figurative-Mark Case

The analysis considers appearance, sound and meaning objectively, as a whole and through separate observation. A shared dominant visual impression can be important, particularly when the marks are used on the same goods.

2011 Hu 1548 Trademark scope confirmation
[Principles of Judgment]
Trademark similarity is assessed objectively and as a whole through appearance, pronunciation and concept, considering the marks as encountered separately. For figurative marks, the dominant visual impression is particularly important.
Mark under reviewEarlier registered markRegistered trademark
MarkIllustration: Trademark Similarity: A Figurative-Mark CaseIllustration: Trademark Similarity: A Figurative-Mark Case
[Comparison of appearance]
Both devices depict an anchor with a circular ring and matching overall arrangement of shank, arms and curved ends. They differ in details such as the shape and thickness of the lines, whether the ring is open, the relative thickness of the arms, color and lettering on the right arm.
[Decisions]
The devices create similar dominant visual impressions. Use on identical or similar goods could confuse consumers or traders as to source, so the court found the marks similar.

Read the Korean source

This article reflects the information available when it was published. Contact us to discuss your circumstances.
Discuss this topic ↗All articlesRelated service: Designs & trade marks ↗ Related service: IP disputes & appeals ↗

Put your IP strategy into practice.