# IP Insights, Commentary & News — Page 34 Browse IPLEX interviews, commentary and updates on AI patents, international trademarks, disputes and filing practice. Source: https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/34 HOME / NEWS & INSIGHTS NEWS & INSIGHTS Ideas, developments and perspectives on IP. Analysis of IP practice, AI technology and international protection, alongside news from IPLEX. Explore the articles in English. 443 articles and updates ⌕ All Trademarks Patents AI & Software Overseas Trademarks IPLEX News Designs Overseas Designs Overseas Patents Copyright Technology Listing 443 articles Patents 2023.04.18 How to Respond Effectively to a Patent Infringement Warning Letter An SME representative recently sought advice after receiving a patent infringement warning by certified mail. This article explains practical considerations in preparing a response. ↗ Read article Trademarks 2023.04.10 Trademark Similarity Case: THE MAGIC BULLET The applied-for mark and the earlier registered mark differ visually in their wording, including “THE MAGIC” and “Steam,” and in their graphic elements. ↗ Read article Trademarks 2023.04.06 Trademark Similarity Case: IBK Comparison of the registered and earlier service marks for financial services, including development finance, international finance, investment, guarantees, lending and accounting. ↗ Read article Trademarks 2023.04.05 Trademark Similarity: ORGASOL versus ORAG The court compares appearance, sound and meaning and considers the marks' overall impression on consumers and traders. For use on the same goods, the central issue is the likelihood of confusion about source. ↗ Read article Trademarks 2023.03.27 Trademark Similarity: birdie versus Blue Birdie Similarity is assessed through the marks' appearance, sound and meaning, considering consumers' overall impression and potential confusion about source. The analysis also considers how the individual word and graphic elements contribute to that impression. ↗ Read article Trademarks 2023.03.22 Trademark Similarity: bistro dº versus BISTRO A composite service mark may be referred to or understood through an independently distinctive element where separating its components would not be unnatural in trade. More than one pronunciation or meaning may therefore arise. ↗ Read article IPLEX News 2023.03.21 Certification as an Intellectual Property Instructor IPLEX patent attorney Yongduck Kim has been certified as an intellectual property instructor. ↗ Read article Trademarks 2023.03.15 Trademark Similarity: A Summary of the Court’s Approach The applied-for mark combines wording with simple green and blue geometric elements. The analysis considers whether those common shapes contribute distinctiveness to the mark. ↗ Read article Trademarks 2023.03.14 Trademark Similarity Case: JS Jangsu Gudeul A mark combining words or graphics need not always be pronounced as a whole. Where the elements are not naturally inseparable, a distinctive part may determine how consumers refer to the mark. ↗ Read article Trademarks 2023.03.13 Trademark Similarity Case: UGLYDOLL Compare the marks' appearance, sound and meaning as ordinary consumers and traders perceive them, then assess whether their overall impressions create a likelihood of confusion about the goods' origin. ↗ Read article Trademarks 2023.03.10 Trademark Similarity: LUISE versus MS. LOUISE The applied-for and earlier registered marks differ in appearance. The applied-for mark is a coined expression, so a meaningful conceptual comparison cannot be made. ↗ Read article Trademarks 2023.03.09 Trademark Similarity: uniPOS versus POS The applied-for trademark and service mark “uniPOS” combine “uni” and “POS” as a single expression. “POS,” short for “Point of Sale,” lacks distinctiveness in the relevant context. The combined mark was therefore found dissimilar to the earlier registered service mark “POS.” ↗ Read article 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/category/trademark - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/category/patent - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/category/ai - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/category/global-trademark - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/category/firm - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/category/design - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/category/global-design - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/category/global-patent - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/category/copyright - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/category/listing - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/830474 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/830474 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/826837 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/826837 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/825144 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/825144 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/824754 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/824754 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/818600 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/818600 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/817208 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/817208 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/816824 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/816824 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/812997 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/812997 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/812139 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/812139 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/811310 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/811310 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/810292 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/810292 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/809693 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/809693 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/2 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/3 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/4 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/5 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/6 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/7 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/8 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/9 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/10 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/11 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/12 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/13 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/14 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/15 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/16 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/17 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/18 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/19 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/20 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/21 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/22 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/23 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/24 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/25 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/26 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/27 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/28 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/29 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/30 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/31 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/32 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/33 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/34 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/35 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/36 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/37