# IP Insights, Commentary & News — Page 20

Browse IPLEX interviews, commentary and updates on AI patents, international trademarks, disputes and filing practice.

Source: https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/20

HOME / NEWS & INSIGHTS NEWS & INSIGHTS Ideas, developments and perspectives on IP. Analysis of IP practice, AI technology and international protection, alongside news from IPLEX. Explore the articles in English. 336 articles and updates ⌕ All Patents AI & Software Overseas Trademarks Designs Trademarks IPLEX News Overseas Designs Overseas Patents Copyright Technology Listing 336 articles Trademarks 2023.11.23 Service Mark Similarity: Case Review The applied-for service mark joins the outer end of an “@” symbol to the beginning of a handwritten “i”, and combines that graphic with “NET”. Cited service mark 1 combines a graphic with “INET”, including a dot between “I” and “NET” and a stylized “N”… ↗ Read article Trademarks 2023.11.22 Trademark Similarity Case: Woori Doori The graphic and word elements of each mark are not so inseparably connected that separate assessment would be unnatural. Nor does their combination create a new concept. The elements can therefore be considered separately when comparing the marks. ↗ Read article Trademarks 2023.11.20 Trademark Similarity: ELOCOM versus Elecom A foreign-language mark is generally assessed by the pronunciation readily used by Korean traders and consumers. Where they actually recognize and pronounce the mark in a particular way, that usage must be considered. ↗ Read article Trademarks 2023.11.17 Trademark Similarity: Ellis versus PERRY ELLIS A composite mark need not always be pronounced or understood in its entirety. Where its elements are separable, an independently distinctive element may determine how the mark is referred to or understood; more than one such reading may be possible. ↗ Read article Trademarks 2023.11.15 Trademark Similarity: A Case-Law Summary Similarity requires an objective assessment of appearance, sound and meaning, considering the marks as a whole and as encountered separately in trade. The question is whether consumers may confuse their commercial origin; similarity in one aspect must be assessed in the overall context. ↗ Read article Trademarks 2023.11.09 Trademark Similarity: WILLIAMS-SONOMA versus WILLIAMS A composite word mark is generally assessed by the appearance, sound and meaning of the wording as a whole. An independently distinctive element may also be relevant where consumers can recognize it as indicating origin. ↗ Read article IPLEX News 2023.11.08 Column: Technology-Based Listings for AI Companies and Technology Business Plans AI Times has published Yongduck Kim's article on technology-based special listings and technology business plans for AI companies. Kim serves as a technical evaluation panel member for a specialist evaluation agency. ↗ Read article Trademarks 2023.11.08 Trademark Similarity: Summary of Judicial Findings A service mark distinguishes the source of services and helps prevent confusion. Because this function is ordinarily performed by the mark as a whole, the comparison considers its overall appearance, sound and meaning. ↗ Read article Trademarks 2023.11.06 Trademark Similarity: Key Points from a Court Decision Microprocessors: Class 9 (originally Class 39; reclassified on 7 June 2002). ↗ Read article Trademarks 2023.11.02 Trademark Similarity: Onggijangi Hangari Kalguksu versus Hangari The registered service mark consists of the Korean wording “Onggijangi Hangari Kalguksu,” while the earlier mark consists of “Hangari.” Viewed as complete expressions, they differ in appearance, sound and meaning. The analysis then considers the role of individual elements within that overall assessment. ↗ Read article IPLEX News 2023.11.01 Kynix Technology Wins an Award at the 2023 Korea Invention Patent Exhibition The 2023 Korea Invention Patent Exhibition promotes the development and commercialization of inventions through exhibitions and awards recognizing innovative technologies and products. ↗ Read article Trademarks 2023.11.01 Trademark Similarity Case: BOSS AUDIO SYSTEMS The applied-for mark has upper and lower elements. “AUDIO SYSTEMS,” in the lower portion, is a term commonly used for the designated goods, which affects the assessment of that element's distinctiveness. ↗ Read article 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/category/patent
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/category/ai
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/category/global-trademark
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/category/design
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/category/trademark
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/category/firm
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/category/global-design
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/category/global-patent
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/category/copyright
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/category/listing
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/956969
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/956969
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/956010
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/956010
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/954273
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/954273
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/952883
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/952883
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/951873
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/951873
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/948417
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/948417
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/948077
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/948077
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/947815
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/947815
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/946550
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/946550
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/944715
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/944715
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/942445
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/942445
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/942261
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/942261
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/2
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/3
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/4
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/5
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/6
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/7
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/8
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/9
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/10
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/11
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/12
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/13
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/14
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/15
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/16
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/17
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/18
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/19
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/20
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/21
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/22
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/23
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/24
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/25
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/26
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/27
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/page/28