# Design creativity and combinations of familiar components A Korean book-holder decision examines coil count, bends, materials and supporting tips under the ease-of-creation test. Source: https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/brunch-case-1852 HOME / NEWS & INSIGHTS NEWS & INSIGHTS Design creativity and combinations of familiar components A Korean book-holder decision examines coil count, bends, materials and supporting tips under the ease-of-creation test. Designs 2026.10.19 published IPLEX 8 min read The registration and the challenge On 16 September 2026, the Korean Patent Court dismissed case 2026Heo10030, preserving invalidation of book-holder design No. 1124179, filed on 2 September 2020 and registered on 16 August 2021. Nice Trading had challenged the registration; IPTAB’s decision 2025Dang1622 of 26 November 2025 found it easily created from prior designs. The article consists of a slender pressure member, a spring at one end and a support touching the book at the other. Design creativity and combinations of familiar components — Figure 2 Visible changes and ease of creation Article 33(2) of Korea’s Design Protection Act asks whether an ordinary designer could readily create the design from known forms. A difference alone is insufficient; ordinary functional variations and combinations may add no distinct aesthetic value. The court considered relationships between the products, fields and visual features, not merely a collection of matching parts. Three spring turns rather than two, and a different inclination of the pressure member, were choices linked to required elasticity and manufacturing or use needs, with limited impact on overall appearance. Design creativity and combinations of familiar components — Figure 3 Bends, materials and a capsule-shaped support The registered design’s bends formed a roughly trapezoidal lower shape. Prior designs 2, 3 or 5 supplied relevant bends, including a page-turner’s book-pressing arm, spring and rubber piece. A flat strip instead of wire did not bar reference to its shape: book visibility and elasticity could guide that choice. Bend positions and angles were ordinary adjustments. Prior design 4, a pressure member for a reading stand, disclosed the elongated capsule-shaped tip replacing design 1’s swollen rice-grain shape. Its simplicity and shared function made the substitution straightforward. Design creativity and combinations of familiar components — Figure 4 What the decision establishes The court found that design 1 could be modified using the bends of designs 2, 3 or 5 and the support of design 4, and upheld invalidation. This was a validity decision, not a ruling on infringement or damages. A design review should explain the aesthetic importance of each change, the silhouette, proportions and connections of the whole, and why combining related references would be difficult. Patent and utility-model drawings can also disclose relevant appearances. The result does not mean that different materials or unrelated documents may always be combined. Design creativity and combinations of familiar components — Figure 5 The original figure labels and forms are preserved; the text explains the source material. Read the Korean source This article reflects the information available when it was published. Contact us to discuss your circumstances. Discuss this topic ↗ All articles Related service: Designs & trade marks ↗ Related service: IP disputes & appeals ↗ ON THIS PAGE The registration and the challenge Visible changes and ease of creation Bends, materials and a capsule-shaped support What the decision establishes TALK TO IPLEX Discuss your IP questions We consider your technology and business needs together. ↗ Contact us Newer PagedAttention: how vLLM manages KV cache and GPU memory ↗ Older Trademark licensing, confusing packaging and cancellation ↗ Related insights Designs 2026.10.20 Design scope and the freedom to use prior designs A Korean floodlight-bracket decision explains when an easily derived design falls outside a registered design’s scope. ↗ Read article Designs 2026.10.19 Coupang design complaint: resolving a sales suspension IPLEX resolved a suspension involving acupressure sandals by connecting pre-filing sales records, customer photographs and product history under Korean design law. ↗ Read article Designs 2026.10.18 Partial designs: why the rear view matters Korean Patent Court case 2026Heo10018 examines the exposed rear strip and bands of a seedling marker, and the evidence needed to establish easy creation. ↗ Read article - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/category/design - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/ko/blog/brunch-case-1852 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/contact - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/ip-solutions/trademark#related-insights - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/ip-solutions/disputes#related-insights - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/brunch-case-1852#article-1852-en-0 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/brunch-case-1852#article-1852-en-1 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/brunch-case-1852#article-1852-en-2 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/brunch-case-1852#article-1852-en-3 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/contact - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/pagedattention-vllm-kv-cache - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/brunch-case-1850 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/brunch-case-1855 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/brunch-case-1855 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/coupang-design-sales-resumption-1848 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/coupang-design-sales-resumption-1848 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/brunch-case-1847 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/brunch-case-1847