# Trademark Similarity: ORGASOL versus ORAG The court compares appearance, sound and meaning and considers the marks' overall impression on consumers and traders. For use on the same goods, the central issue is the likelihood of confusion about source. Source: https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/824754 HOME / NEWS & INSIGHTS NEWS & INSIGHTS Trademark Similarity: ORGASOL versus ORAG The court compares appearance, sound and meaning and considers the marks' overall impression on consumers and traders. For use on the same goods, the central issue is the likelihood of confusion about source. Trademarks 2023.04.05 published IPLEX 5 min read 2009 Heo 2074 Trademark refusal [Principles of Judgment] Trademark similarity is assessed objectively and as a whole, considering appearance, pronunciation and concept as consumers encounter the marks separately. A composite word mark may be perceived through a distinctive component unless its elements are inseparably combined. A non-distinctive or weakly distinctive element generally cannot be the dominant element on its own. Earlier registered Trademark 1 The Earlier registered Trademark 2 Applied for trademark Mark Designated Goods Class 2: fire-resistant, disinfectant, aluminum, anti-fouling, fireproof, anti-rust, zinc-rich, mold-resistant, chemical-resistant, oil-resistant, heat-resistant, anti-condensation, anti-poster and anti-slip paints, among others. Former Class 13 under the Trademark Act Enforcement Rules before amendment by Ordinance No. 26 of 30 December 1995: shampoo, toilet soap, hair conditioner, powdered soap, beauty soap, cream soap, toothpaste, toothbrushes and toothbrush cases. Class 2: chemical-resistant coatings, fire-resistant paints, varnishes, asbestos paints, water-based coatings, aluminum paints, enamels, anti-fouling paints and synthetic-resin coatings, among others. Class 3: nourishing cream, lavender perfume, liquid rouge, lipstick, massage gel, nail polish, hair oil, hair dye, bath oil, cosmetic sun lotion and skin milk, among others. [Similarity of the marks] 1. Appearance The applied-for mark combines the coined element “ORGA” with “SOL”, which describes a chemical property of the goods. Earlier registered mark 1 is also a coined mark without a particular meaning. Earlier registered mark 2 combines “OLGA”, a coined term or common English-language female name, with its Korean transliteration. The marks differ in letter count and in whether Korean lettering is present, so their appearances differ. 2. Pronunciation Applied-for mark “SOL” refers to a fluid colloidal dispersion and describes a chemical characteristic of the goods. The mark may therefore be separated into the distinctive “ORGA” and the weakly distinctive “SOL”. Consumers may shorten it to “ORGA”, pronounced in Korean as “oreuga” or “olga”, making its pronunciation identical to earlier mark 1. Compared with earlier registered mark 2, the Korean pronunciation is identical or very similar. 3. Concept Conceptual similarity concerns whether the meanings of marks suggest a common source. Because “ORGASOL” combines the meaningless coined element “ORGA” with the descriptive “SOL” and has no definite overall concept, a conceptual comparison with the earlier marks is not possible. [Designated goods] The applied-for mark covers Class 2 paints and coatings and Class 3 cosmetics. These goods are identical or similar to earlier mark 1's paints and earlier mark 2's shampoo, soaps, conditioner, toothpaste, toothbrushes and toothbrush cases. [Decisions] Despite their different appearances, the marks have identical or very similar pronunciations when the applied-for mark is referred to by its dominant element “ORGA”. Their goods are also identical or similar. The court found a likelihood of confusion and held the marks similar. Read the Korean source This article reflects the information available when it was published. Contact us to discuss your circumstances. Discuss this topic ↗ All articles Related service: Designs & trade marks ↗ Related service: IP disputes & appeals ↗ TALK TO IPLEX Discuss your IP questions We consider your technology and business needs together. ↗ Contact us Newer Trademark Similarity Case: IBK ↗ Older Trademark Similarity: birdie versus Blue Birdie ↗ Related insights Trademarks 2026.10.01 TikTok for confectionery: dilution can prevent registration in Korea Korean Patent Court case 2025Heo10379 explains why different goods and later commercial success did not overcome the reputation and distinctiveness of TikTok. ↗ Read article Trademarks 2026.09.30 Can Fear of a Trade Mark Dispute Justify Non-Use? Korean Supreme Court decision 2024후10504 separates an intention to launch from actual use and objective obstacles beyond the owner’s control. ↗ Read article Trademarks 2026.09.29 An App Name: A Mark for Software or for the Service It Delivers? The 010PAY decision, 2025허10405, considers actual transactions, revenue and the proper subject of Korean trade mark scope proceedings. ↗ Read article - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/category/trademark - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/forum/view/824754 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/contact - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/ip-solutions/trademark#related-insights - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/ip-solutions/disputes#related-insights - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/contact - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/825144 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/818600 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/brunch-case-1782 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/brunch-case-1782 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/brunch-case-1776 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/brunch-case-1776 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/brunch-case-1771 - https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/brunch-case-1771