# Case Result: Petition for Non-Use Trademark Cancellation Granted

IPLEX obtained a decision granting its client's petition for non-use trademark cancellation.

Source: https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/1106175

HOME / NEWS & INSIGHTS NEWS & INSIGHTS Case Result: Petition for Non-Use Trademark Cancellation Granted IPLEX obtained a decision granting its client's petition for non-use trademark cancellation. Trademarks 2024.09.26 published IPLEX 1 min read IPLEX obtained a decision granting its client's petition for non-use trademark cancellation. A non-use cancellation trial may be requested where a Korean registered mark has not been used for three consecutive years before the request without justifiable grounds. Our client sought cancellation of a cited mark blocking its own application. The tribunal granted the cancellation petition, clearing the way for the client's trademark registration. IPLEX IP Law Firm provides the best strategy for securing domestic trademarks. Read the Korean source This article reflects the information available when it was published. Contact us to discuss your circumstances. Discuss this topic ↗ All articles Related service: Designs & trade marks ↗ Related service: IP disputes & appeals ↗ TALK TO IPLEX Discuss your IP questions We consider your technology and business needs together. ↗ Contact us Newer Nota Receives Strong Technology Evaluation Results for Special Listing ↗ Older New Book: Strategies for Securing AI Patents — CommunicationBooks AI Series 021 ↗ Related insights Trademarks 2026.10.01 TikTok for confectionery: dilution can prevent registration in Korea Korean Patent Court case 2025Heo10379 explains why different goods and later commercial success did not overcome the reputation and distinctiveness of TikTok. ↗ Read article Trademarks 2026.09.30 Can Fear of a Trade Mark Dispute Justify Non-Use? Korean Supreme Court decision 2024후10504 separates an intention to launch from actual use and objective obstacles beyond the owner’s control. ↗ Read article Trademarks 2026.09.29 An App Name: A Mark for Software or for the Service It Delivers? The 010PAY decision, 2025허10405, considers actual transactions, revenue and the proper subject of Korean trade mark scope proceedings. ↗ Read article

- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/category/trademark
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/forum/view/1106175
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/contact
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/ip-solutions/trademark#related-insights
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/ip-solutions/disputes#related-insights
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/contact
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/1152549
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/1071283
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/brunch-case-1782
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/brunch-case-1782
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/brunch-case-1776
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/brunch-case-1776
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/brunch-case-1771
- https://www.iplexlaw.co.kr/en/blog/brunch-case-1771